HealthNewsReview.org | Independent Expert Reviews of News Stories | Holding Health and Medical Journalism Accountable

Latest Reviews

Electromagnetic Pulses May Stem Arthritic Knee Pain

March 6, 2010

This is shovelware - straight from a hospital news release into a slapped-together "news" story. 
(read more)

RATING: 0 Stars

Breakthrough asthma treatment

March 4, 2010

CNN chose to label this as a breakthrough.  We wish they had simply provided more balance.
(read more)

RATING:

Test May Cut Unneeded Prostate Biopsies

March 4, 2010

News coverage via news briefing - far from best practice.
(read more)

RATING:

Portable Device May Relieve Migraine Pain

March 3, 2010

Why were about 2/3 of the original subjects not randomized or why did another third drop out after randomization?  Seems like an important omission in this story.  (read more)

RATING:

Cord blood stem cells help meet minority marrow needs

March 1, 2010

This was an unbalanced story touting "a medical breakthrough that's saving lives."  Two rosy anecdotes are the only evidence we get. The online headline also emphasizes a "minority" angle that is barely touched on in the story.  (read more)

RATING:

Gary's Blog

Mar 9, 2010

March madness means marketing for urologists

Ahhh, spring! When a young man's thoughts turn to:

• urinating at baseball Spring training • getting a vasectomy during basketball March Madness.
Am I right? I am if I do marketing for urologists. American Medical News reports that some urologists are trying to get men's at

Mar 9, 2010

Kudos to ABC for story on leg fracture risks from osteoporosis drugs

Mar 8, 2010

Journal editor troubled by Obama's CT scan for coronary calcium & virtual colonoscopy

Mar 8, 2010

The high-tech prostate treatment train has left the station...before the evidence is in

Mar 8, 2010

Syracuse professor hired to rid health insurance system of conflicts brings conflict of her own

Mar 8, 2010

Kudos to Chicago Tribune front page story on "perfect storm" of CT radiation risks

Mar 5, 2010

Science & chronic fatigue syndrome: criticism of journal reviewing

Knowing relative risk reduction is like knowing you have a 50% off coupon but not knowing whether it's for a Lexus or a lollipop. Absolute risk reduction tells you what the "coupon" is worth. Read more.


Read More

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is considered the gold standard of preventive health recommendations - including on screening tests. It's a good source for journalists and consumers.

Read More

About 70% of the stories reviewed from 2006-9 failed to adequately discuss costs, or to explain how big (or small) are the potential benefits and harms of treatments, tests, products and procedures.


Read More

We have documented a disturbing trend of news stories taking an advocacy stance, promoting certain screening tests outside the boundaries of scientific evidence.


Read More

Stories on new technologies like Cyberknife, DaVinci robotic surgery systems, and proton beam cancer therapy often fail to scrutinize the evidence and/or to discuss the costs involved.

Read More

Rather than suggesting that everyone should be screened for everything, news stories could explain: "All screening tests cause harm; some may do good."

Read More

The first 38 network TV network morning health news stories reviewed in 2009 earned an average score of 1.2 stars. 13 of the 38 stories got ZERO stars.

Read More

Both TIME magazine and BusinessWeek have published terrific stories explaining the importance of the Number Needed to Treat - or NNT.

Read More

Knowing relative risk reduction is like knowing you have a 50% off coupon but not knowing whether it's for a Lexus or a lollipop. Absolute risk reduction tells you what the "coupon" is worth. Read more.


Read More

The website NoFreeLunch.org posts "a database of health care professionals who have pledged to accept no gifts from industry and to rely on non-promotional sources of information."

Read More

To help journalists cover stories responsibly, we post a list of independent experts who state that they do not have financial ties to drug or medical device manufacturers.

Read More

We apply the same ten standardized criteria to the review of every story.

Read More

We have about 30 story reviewers. Each story is reviewed by 3 different people.

Read More

Gary Schwitzer's seven words you shouldn't use in medical news: cure, miracle, breakthrough, promising, dramatic, hope, victim. Read why.

Read More

Our reviewers include two former CNN medical reporters and a former editor of the Washington Post health section.

Read More